Sunday, December 19, 2010

One could argue that Georgia has been under the Tea Party Influence for some time.


One could argue that Georgia has been under the Tea Party Influence for some time.
 In presidential races, Georgia has failed to give its electoral college votes to the Republican candidate only four times since 1964: in 1968segregationist George Wallace won a plurality of Georgia's votes on the American Independent Party ticket; former Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter won his home state by landslide margins in 1976 and 1980; and then-ArkansasGovernor Bill Clinton won a plurality of votes in 1992 against incumbent Republican George H. W. Bush and Independent Ross Perot. Republican George W. Bush won Georgia in 2000and 2004 with 54.67% and 57.97%, respectively, of the vote. However, in 2008John McCain won the state by only 5 points, 52% to Democrat Barack Obama's 47%.
By 2007, conservative Republicans had become the dominant force in state politics, with Republicans holding the offices of governor and lieutenant governor and significant majorities in both houses of the state General Assembly. U.S. Senators Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson are together considered to be one of the most conservative Senate delegations.[citation needed] Since 2005, Georgia's U.S. House delegation has been composed of 7 Republicans and 6 Democrats.
The Tea Party is a political movement in the United States that has sponsored locally- and nationally-coordinated protests since 2009.[1][2][3]Its platform is explicitly populist[4][5][6] and is generally recognized as conservative and libertarian.[7][8] It endorses reduced government spending,[9][10] lower taxes,[10] reduction of the national debt and federal budget deficit,[9] and adherence to an originalist interpretation of theUnited States Constitution.[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement
  It focuses on smaller government, fiscal responsibility, individual freedoms and upholding a conservative view of the Constitution.
 As of 2010, the Tea Party Movement is not a national political party, does not officially run Congressional candidates, and its name has not appeared on any ballots, but it has so far endorsed Republican candidates.[14] The Tea Party movement has no central leadership but is composed of a loose affiliation of national and local groups that determine their own platforms and agendas. For this reason, the Tea Party movement is often cited as an example of grassroots political activity, although it has also been cited as an example of astroturfing.
 Several polls have been conducted on the demographics of the movement. Though the various polls sometimes turn up slightly different results, they tend to show that Tea Party supporters are mainly white and slightly more likely to be male, married, older than 45, more conservative than the general population, and likely to be more wealthy and have more education.[53][54][55][56][57]
One Gallup poll found that other than gender, income and politics, self-described Tea Party members were demographically similar to the population as a whole.[58]
When surveying supporters or participants of the Tea Party movement, polls have shown that they are significantly more likely to be registered Republican, have a favorable opinion of the Republican Party and an unfavorable opinion of the Democratic Party.[57][59] The Bloomberg Newspoll showed that 40% are 55 or older, 79% are white, 61% are men and 44% identify as "born-againChristians,[60] compared to 23.4%,[61]75%,[62] 48.5%,[63] and 34%[64] for the general population, respectively.
 Many of the movement's members also hold conservative views on social issues such as illegal immigration.[70] However, political analyst Dick Morris has argued that in a "fundamental change" evangelical or social issues do not dominate the Republican activists in 2010, because "economic and fiscal issues prevail. The Tea Party has made the Republican Party safe for libertarians."[7]
Political analyst Dick Morris says there is no national leadership. "Those who conduct its affairs are mere coordinators of local groups where the real power lies. The entire affair is a grass roots-dominated movement." He notes that the teapartypatriots.org umbrella group, with more than 2,800 local affiliates, has only seven paid staff members, and a payroll of $50,000 a month.[7] The movement has been supported nationally by prominent individuals and organizations,[73][74] including:

State government is too big for taxpayers,states Deal.


 Gov.-elect Nathan Deal said Wednesday state government was too big for taxpayers and called for downsizing of the state's 104,000-member workforce.http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/deal-state-government-workforce-778417.html?cxtype=rss_news
 The state's high personnel costs are a key obstacle in meeting budget obligations, Deal said.
"We're going to have to downsize in that department as well and that's tough, because sometimes there are people who are doing very good jobs," he said. "But because of the change in circumstances, we may not be able to justify those in the public sector any longer."
The challenge Georgia faces, he said, is that while tax dollars have dwindled, government still has a structure in place that anticipates much more money to sustain it than is available. The situation requires that government shrink to match its means, he said.
 According to 2008 Census data, the state of Georgia and local governments in the state employed a total of 604,002 people.[3] Of those employees, 498,404 were full-time employees receiving a net pay of $1,728,268,497 per month and 105,598 were part-time employees paid $110,993,986 per month.[3] More than 55% of those employees, or 354,531 employees, were in education or higher education.[3]
 Deal has also mentioned that Georgia is in arrears to the federal government for $454 million in loans to its Unemployment Trust Fund and is due to repay those funds in November 2011.[8] http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Georgia_state_budget
 Perdue exempted K-12 schools from the latest cut, but not the university system. It will affect  agencies that hand out driver's licenses, educate college students and run parks, prisons and health care programs that cover more than a 1 million Georgians. Those agencies employ about 90,000 people.
The move, which will save the state $25.5 million per month, is a preemptive one, the governor's office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Congress could still come through with the stimulus money before the end of the year. But it's far from certain.
Perdue and lawmakers approved a budget for this fiscal year, which began July 1, that counted on about $375 million in extra federal Medicaid stimulus money. About 30 states wrote the the extra money for Medicaid, which provides health care to the poor and disabled,  into their budget plans.
But conservative Democrats and Republicans in Congress stalled the funding, arguing that it added to the burgeoning federal deficit. Lawmakers such as U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) say they can only support it if there are offsetting spending cuts.
"Our national debt has now surpassed $13 trillion and we cannot continue spending at this alarming rate," Isakson said. "This is a painful debate, but it is a necessary debate.”
Bert Brantley, the governor's spokesman, said the state needed to react quickly to the possibility it might not get the money.
"The main thing driving this is we don't want to wait until January to make some of these adjustments if they are necessary," Brantley said.
Georgia's state budget has been cut more than $3 billion during the past two years.

 Most Tea Party members view the candidates they elected in November as agents of change from government business as usual, but non-members are a lot more skeptical.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone poll finds that only 34% of all Likely U.S. Voters think Tea Party candidates elected in November will remain true to their beliefs. A plurality (46%) says they will become just like other politicians. Twenty percent (20%) aren’t sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
But among those who identify themselves as members of the Tea Party, 77% say the candidates they elected will remain true to their beliefs, and just 13% disagree.
But, among those with no ties to the Tea Party Movement, 61% believe Tea Party candidates elected last month will become just like other politicians. Twenty-one percent (21%) of this group think those candidates will stick to their beliefs, and 18% are undecided.
This level of skepticism is perhaps not surprising given that most voters are largely pessimistic about what the new Congress will accomplish in areas like immigration, taxes and government spending in the next two years.
(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls).  Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.  
The survey of 1,000 Likely U.S. Voters was conducted on December 15-16, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Will Tea Party activists be satisfied with how the politicians in Washington perform over the next two years? How confident are unaffiliated voters that the newly elected Tea Party members of Congress won’t sell out?